National ranking
Rank table
Filter, sort, and export the country table
| Compare | Rank↑ | Country↕ | Overall↕ | Tier↕ | Summary | Published Headroom↕ | Connection Process↕ | Reinforcement Momentum↕ | Primary Constraint | Confidence↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Add | #1 | SingaporeOpen evidence | 84Leading | Leading | Singapore combines centrally managed capacity additions, visible demand-growth planning, and a clear future-grid roadmap, making it unusually direct for new large-load and generation decisions. | 84 / 100Central demand and capacity outlook is explicitmixed | 86 / 100Connection route is coordinated and legibleproxy-rich | 82 / 100Future grid capability program is activemixed | Land scarcity limits network expansion options | mixedmixed / proxy-rich |
| Add | #2 | SpainOpen evidence | 82Leading | Leading | Spain stands out for publishing transmission demand-access capacities and continuing to widen interconnection and renewable integration paths, giving projects better visibility than most peers. | 87 / 100Demand access transparency is unusually strongdirect | 76 / 100Access process is readable and evidence-backedmixed | 82 / 100Transmission expansion keeps pace with transitionmixed | Some access information remains specialised and operator-centric | directdirect / mixed |
| Add | #3 | Great BritainOpen evidence | 81Leading | Leading | Great Britain has moved aggressively to clear speculative queue backlog and prioritise shovel-ready projects, but transmission build speed is still the practical bottleneck. | 80 / 100Queue transparency improved materiallymixed | 88 / 100Connection process has clear reform momentumdirect | 74 / 100Reinforcement momentum is real but still constrainedproxy-rich | Transmission construction and planning consents remain slow | directmixed / direct / proxy-rich |
| Add | #4 | New ZealandOpen evidence | 79Advancing | Advancing | New Zealand is comparatively open about connection steps, avoids speculative capacity reservation, and is building a future grid blueprint around electrification growth. | 74 / 100Capacity outlook is visible through planning toolsproxy-rich | 84 / 100Connection process is clear and developer-legibledirect | 80 / 100Future reinforcement programme is coherentmixed | Complex projects still run beyond three years | directproxy-rich / direct / mixed |
| In set | #5 | AustraliaOpen evidence | 78Advancing | Advancing | Australia has unusually strong public connection and planning artefacts, but the same transparency also reveals just how heavy the build requirement is across the system. | 78 / 100Connection transparency is better than averagemixed | 74 / 100Process support is strong but complexity stays highmixed | 83 / 100Reinforcement pipeline is deep and visibledirect | The queue is large and geographically fragmented | directmixed / direct |
| In set | #6 | FranceOpen evidence | 78Advancing | Advancing | France pairs a relatively meshed grid with visible reinforcement programmes and concrete high-capacity connection examples, making it one of the stronger environments for new large projects. | 78 / 100Large-connection visibility is credibleproxy-rich | 74 / 100Strong for large strategic projectsmixed | 83 / 100Reinforcement pipeline is tangibledirect | Lead times still depend on regional reinforcement delivery | directproxy-rich / mixed / direct |
| Add | #7 | DenmarkOpen evidence | 75Advancing | Advancing | Denmark benefits from a system operator that openly frames long-term grid needs and flexible network use, which supports confidence in future connection availability even when local capacity is tight. | 72 / 100Forward capacity outlook is publicproxy-rich | 73 / 100Connection path is readable through planning artefactsmixed | 81 / 100Reinforcement momentum is strongmixed | Small system geography means local constraints matter quickly | mixedproxy-rich / mixed |
| In set | #8 | SwedenOpen evidence | 73Advancing | Advancing | Sweden has a strong published transmission build plan and clear evidence of capacity-led reinforcements, but regional constraints remain a real issue for electrification-heavy demand growth. | 69 / 100Headroom is visible indirectly through plansproxy-rich | 70 / 100Process is readable but not highly standardisedmixed | 80 / 100Reinforcement programme is active and concretemixed | Demand-heavy electrification regions still face tight capacity pockets | mixedproxy-rich / mixed |
| Add | #9 | NorwayOpen evidence | 72Advancing | Advancing | Norway offers a relatively explicit connection pathway and flexible-connection options, but real available capacity varies sharply by geography and is constrained in several industrial growth areas. | 66 / 100Capacity scarcity is visible, but often after regional analysismixed | 78 / 100Connection rules are explicitdirect | 72 / 100Reinforcement path is credible but regionally unevenmixed | Available capacity is highly regional and not uniformly abundant | directmixed / direct |
| Add | #10 | GermanyOpen evidence | 68Constrained | Constrained | Germany has serious scale and a mature planning apparatus, but it remains a harder market for rapid new connections because the build requirement is immense and access is less legible than the best performers. | 64 / 100Planning visibility is strong; project-ready headroom less soproxy-rich | 66 / 100Process is rigorous, not fast-pathproxy-rich | 76 / 100Reinforcement scale is high, delivery challenge remainsmixed | Planning complexity is high for outsiders | mixedproxy-rich / mixed |
| In set | #11 | IrelandOpen evidence | 64Constrained | Constrained | Ireland is transparent about the tightening balance between demand and supply and is actively adding capacity, but the system remains under enough pressure that new projects face a more constrained connection environment than the leaders. | 60 / 100Visibility is good; surplus room is limitedmixed | 65 / 100Process is visible, but system pressure reduces easemixed | 68 / 100Reinforcement is improving but not yet abundantmixed | Demand growth is strong relative to system scale | mixedmixed |
| Add | #12 | NetherlandsOpen evidence | 60Bottlenecked | Bottlenecked | The Netherlands is one of the clearest examples of a highly desirable market hitting real grid limits: TenneT is transparent about congestion and building heavily, but near-term connection ease is notably constrained. | 55 / 100Transparency is high; available room is lowmixed | 58 / 100Process is transparent, not easymixed | 69 / 100Buildout is large, near-term relief is slowerproxy-rich | Large parts of the high-voltage grid are full | mixedmixed / proxy-rich |